Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Pat Frank

Quote:Donald L. Klipstein, “[i]My link to the observational evidence isn’t modeling Frank[/i]”

But the meaning of the evidence is, Donald.

The question is not whether CO2 emissions cause extra forcing. The question is how the climate responds.

The only way to resolve the response question is through a falsifiable physical theory of the terrestrial climate.

That theory is not in hand. 

You can go ahead and infer all the conclusions you like, Donald, but they’re all physically meaningless.

The climate has several rapid response channels, including evaporation/condensation, convection, cloud formation, and cloud cover. Climate models do a poor job with all of them.

No one knows how the climate is responding to 2.5 W/m^2 of extra GHG forcing. Not even you.

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)